Apple ordered to pay €39 million to French carriers over iPhone sales
A French court has ruled that Apple must pay around €39 million (approximately $45 million) to several mobile network operators, following accusations that the tech giant imposed unfair contractual conditions to allow them to sell iPhones.
The decision, issued earlier this month by the Paris Commercial Court, also included an additional fine of €8 million against Apple. The ruling relates to contracts signed more than a decade ago between Apple and France’s main mobile operators, during a period when the French competition and consumer protection authority, the DGCCRF, reviewed the terms under which Apple allowed operators to distribute its devices.
According to the court, Apple included clauses in the contracts that forced operators to sell a specified number of iPhones and set fixed retail prices, restricting the carriers’ ability to freely manage sales. Additionally, Apple monitored how its products and trademarks were presented in operators’ advertising, while simultaneously using the carriers’ patents without paying fees or providing any reciprocal benefit.
The court determined these clauses were unfair and subsequently voided them. The judgment emphasizes that operators were unfairly constrained by Apple’s contractual requirements, limiting their business freedom and leveraging Apple’s dominant position in the smartphone market.
Apple confirmed to AFP that it plans to appeal the ruling. However, under French law, filing an appeal does not suspend the application of the decision, meaning the company must proceed with the payments while the legal process continues.
As a result, Apple is now required to transfer the awarded sums to three of France’s four main mobile network operators: Bouygues Telecom, Free, and SFR. The fourth operator, Orange, was not included in the compensation.
This case highlights ongoing scrutiny over the business practices of major tech companies in Europe. Regulators and courts have increasingly focused on how global technology firms negotiate agreements with local partners, particularly when such agreements may limit competition or impose restrictive conditions. Apple’s contracts with French operators are a notable example of this trend, illustrating the tension between tech giants’ commercial strategies and national regulations designed to protect competition and consumer choice.
The ruling marks another significant moment in Apple’s legal challenges in Europe, where it has faced multiple investigations and fines over competitive practices, taxation, and consumer rights. Analysts expect that the appeal process could extend over several months, prolonging the legal dispute but not delaying the immediate financial impact on Apple.